The Beauty of Pollination (video)

Pollination is the essential activity that keeps the food chain intact, that literally puts the food on our tables.   It just happens to also be beauty in motion, the dance of life itself...

What Makes the HPV Vaccine So Dangerous

The Boys Are Next

With the US government in the hip pocket of Big Pharma, it is only a matter of time before you will be confronted with another mandated vaccine to keep us safe and protect us. The HPV (Gardasil) the most expensive and perhaps most dangerous vaccine yet is already mandated in several states. In fact, Gov. 'Moonbeam' himself in California has now made it possible for under-age girls to waive parental consent and notification to receive Gardasil at school. Presumably parents would be notified to deal with the expected side-effects- after all they are the responsible parties, right? 
So here's some more information before crazy gets crazier! Oh- this just in- Crazy just got crazier! Now the HPV is recommended by the FDA for boys too! To protect them from cervical cancer. Wow! Last time I checked boys didn't have a cervix


October 7, 2011

HPV vaccine cocktail targets not only HPV

By Cynthia A. Janak

For over four years now I have been researching how this vaccine works. I have wondered why did they use the ingredients that they did and what repercussions that they could have on the body. The other reason is that I wanted to find out WHY THESE VACCINES CAUSE SO MUCH HARM!I have also discovered that it is not necessarily the HPV VLP recombinant DNA as being the culprit in this cocktail because between the carrier solution and the vaccine there is only approx. 3.0% difference. I am now more prone to believe that it is the carrier solution with the adjuvant as being the real perpetrator in this vaccine cocktail of harm.

The ingredients of this cocktail are what cause the enhanced immune response. This is typical of any vaccine. What I did not understand over four years ago was why so many adverse reactions were being reported because of these HPV vaccines. I now have a better understanding of the process and what the vaccine cocktail has the potential to do.

In the Gardasil® vaccine we have the ingredients AAHS (MAA — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate(1)) as the adjuvant and in the carrier solution 9.56 mg of sodium chloride, 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 mcg of polysorbate 80, 35 mcg of sodium borate. (1,2)

The AAHS (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate) also referenced as MAA (Merck's Aluminum Adjuvant) targets a strong Th2 response. (3,4) In this adjuvant we have Aluminum which we know is a neurotoxin. The Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (10) states that Aluminum Hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. (11)

This adjuvant also contains hydroxy. It is not disclosed by Merck whether this is a Hydroxyl or Hydroxyl radical. If this is indeed the Hydroxyl radical then there is also a problem as this free radical can cause damage to oxidative cells particularly red blood cells. (5, 6) This tells me that there is a possibility that the reports I have received from moms about anemia could be because of this.

The last part of this adjuvant cocktail is the sulfate. It is not disclosed on the Physicians Product Insert that people with a sulfur allergy should not receive this vaccine. (7) It is well known that people with an allergy to any type of sulfate have the potential to be at risk for an adverse event that could result in an anaphylactic response which could be life threatening. (8)

There are different types of aluminum adjuvants. "The two most common aluminum salts employed as adjuvants are the phosphate and hydroxide forms. The salts themselves have been well characterized with aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel®) usually found in a crystalline state (4, 5), whereas aluminum phosphate exists in an amorphous form (5, 6)." (9)

One thing I always wondered about was if this vaccine cocktail had the potential to cause a cytokine storm. Here is a quote: "suggested mechanism of action is by a direct stimulation of the immune system through enhanced cytokine production. Aluminum salt adjuvants are known to primarily stimulate a humoral response. More specifically, it is believed that this class of adjuvants does so by stimulation of the production of Th2 cytokines." (9)

Let's look at the aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide.

I found several MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet)'s on aluminum phosphate and to my surprise this is what I found.

The New Jersey government has this listed in their "Right to Know Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet." (16) Reactivity: Aluminum Phosphate reacts violently with STRONG BASES (such as SODIUM HYDROXIDE and POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE) and STRONG ACIDS (such as HYDROCHLORIC,SULFURIC and NITRIC). FIRST AID AND DECONTAMINATION: Remove the person from exposure. Flush eyes with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Remove contact lenses if worn. Immediate medical attention is necessary. Remove contaminated clothing and wash contaminated skin with soap and water. Begin artificial respiration if breathing has stopped and CPR if necessary. Transfer to a medical facility

This one comes from Science Lab. (17) Aluminum Phosphate: Synonym:Phosphoric Acid, Aluminum salt; Aluminum orthophosphate, Chemical Name: Aluminum Phosphate

Section 11: Toxicological Information: Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans: Acute Potential Health Effects: Skin: May cause skin irritation. No sensitizing effects known. Eyes: Causes eye irritation

Inhalation: Causes respiratory tract and mucous membrane irritation. Ingestion: Causes gastrointestinal tract irritation. May affect behavior. Chronic Potential Health Effects: no information found. The toxicological properties of this substance have not been fully investigated.There was just so much on this I had to add just one more from SPI Pharma, Inc. (18) This is choice. I know you will love this. Repeated Dose Effects:Chronic overexposure to aluminum can result in lung damage and has been associated with asthma-like syndrome. Accumulation of aluminum in the body may result in neurological damage, anemia and bone softening.There you have it. ACCUMULATION OF ALUMINUM MAY RESULT IN NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE.

Aluminum Hydroxide is the next ingredient of the cocktail I want to look at. This comes from The Free Dictionary, Medical section. (19) Adverse reactions: CNS: malaise (with prolonged use), neurotoxicity, encephalopathy, GI: constipation, anorexia (with prolonged use), intestinal obstruction, Metabolic: hypophosphatemia (with prolonged use) [Hypophosphatemia is a low level of phosphorus in the blood.],Musculoskeletal: osteomalacia [Osteomalacia is softening of the bones due to a lack of vitamin D or a problem with the body's ability to break down and use this vitamin.] and chronic phosphate deficiency with bone pain, malaise, muscle weakness (with prolonged use), Other: aluminum toxicity

I am beginning to really like Science Lab. (20) This is what they have to say about Aluminum Hydroxide. Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans: Acute Potential Health Effects: May cause mild skin, eye and upper respiratory tract irritation. Ingestion: May cause gastrointestinal tract irritation: May affect bones (osteomalacia), metabolism, blood, behavior (muscle contraction, spasticity, change in motor activity), liver.

Don't you just love that word potential (Acute Potential Health Effects). That is enough of that. You get the idea about the aluminum adjuvant. This AAHS/MAA has the real potential to be a chemical cocktail and I feel the composition should be revealed by Merck due to what I have shown here.

Going back to the Th2 response, according to the Merck Manual the Th2 response promotes "IgE production and development of allergic disorders." (12) People with allergies or a family history of same could have elevated levels of IgE (13) and histamine (4, 14) receptors.

This vaccine cocktail has L-histidine which is the precursor of histamine in the body. This quote from a study pretty much addresses my concerns of whether the histamine could be a trigger mechanism in this vaccine cocktail. "Histamine is one of the molecules involved in pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. T cell mediated regulation and suppression of autoreactive T cells seems to be ineffective in controlling the enhanced immune reaction in patients where the discrimination between self and non-self is changed." (14) What they mean by self and non-self I believe is your normal cells and the toxins, pathogens, viruses, etc. that do not belong in the body.

The new vaccines like the HPV's are said to promote an enhanced immune response to produce high titers (levels) of anti-bodies. This would then be a distinct possibility as to all the young people with new auto-immune diseases diagnosed.

Polysorbate 80 is also in this vaccine cocktail. Many people say that the Polysorbate 80 can cause infertility. From what I have found this has not been studied much as to an injection. I have seen several studies where it was ingested and did not cause much of a problem. What I did see was low weight gain and growth in mice. But that is not the real story behind Polysorbate 80.

Polysorbate 80 could very well be the reason for the drop in blood pressure that is being experienced in the young people. The National Toxicology Program by the Department of Health and Human Services has information about testing for Toxicity Effects. CAS Registry Number: 9005-65-6 Toxicity Effects. Here are some of the results on Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80).

LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure: Commercial iv amiodarone and polysorbate 80 caused a 60% drop in mean blood pressure and left ventricular maximum dP/dT for at least 30 minutes in dogs... polysorbate 80 is not an inert substance, but is a potent cardiac depressant.

LABORATORY ANIMALS: Acute Exposure: Tween 80 (2.4 ug/mL perfusion fluid) showed a coronary vasodilatory effect and increased the cardiac output in isolated guinea pig and rabbit hearts,

LABORATORY ANIMALS: Chronic Exposure or Carcinogenicity:Whereas only 10% of the rats given iv injections of 106 Walker tumor cells developed metastatic tumors, animals given, with the 1 mL cell suspension,Tween 80 (1%) showed 40% incidence of metastasis

LABORATORY ANIMALS: Chronic Exposure or Carcinogenicity: /In/ 2 yr feed studies, there was equivocal evidence of /carcinogenicity/ polysorbate 80 in male F344/N rats

This makes me wonder about all the young people who have died from unknown causes. I now wonder how Merck could not put on their reports to the FDA about carcinogenicity of their vaccine cocktail. I would think that this would need to be included and not omitted.

With all I have so far I want to go back and address the IgE again. This I took from the Merck Manual and reported it in an earlier article.

"Type I: Type I reactions (immediate hypersensitivity) are IgE-mediated. Antigen binds to IgE (which is bound to tissue mast cells and blood basophils), triggering release of preformed mediators (eg, histamine,proteases, chemotactic factors) and synthesis of other mediators (eg, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, platelet-activating factor, cytokines). These mediators cause VASODILATION, increased capillary permeability, mucus hypersecretion, smooth muscle spasm, and tissue infiltration with eosinophils, type 2 helper T cells (TH2), and other inflammatory cells. Type I reactions underlie atopic disorders (eg, allergic asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis) and latex and some food allergies."

"Pathophysiology

When allergen binds to IgE-sensitized mast cells and basophils, histamine is released from their intracellular granules. Mast cells are widely distributed but are most concentrated in skin, lungs, and GI mucosa; histamine facilitates inflammation and is the primary mediator of clinical atopy. Physical disruption of tissue and various substances (eg, tissue irritants, opioids, surface-active agents, complement components C3a and C5a) can trigger histamine release directly, independent of IgE."

Histamine causes the following:

• Local VASODILATION (causing erythema)
  
  

What has amazed me is that I have found studies about fertility but they were only about ingestion and not injection. Here is an interesting study about sodium chloride and chicken eggs. "Egg fertility was significantly depressed by .48% and numerically reduced by .36%. ... and that daily sodium intakes in the range of 320 to 420 mg may reduce fertility in broiler breeders." (15) Several references were made that refined sodium chloride was toxic but I could not find any scientific research to back up the claims but it does make you wonder what if it is true.

Let us address the last ingredient, sodium borate. The CDC surprised me on this one and that they have it listed under NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Physical Description: White, odorless, crystalline solid. [herbicide]and Incompatibilities & Reactivities: Zirconium, strong acids, metallic salts.Now would not aluminum salts be reactive with Sodium Borate? But yet we are going to inject both together in a vaccine. What is wrong with this picture?

We know that sodium borate has other names and that is borax, sodium tetraborate, or disodium tetraborate. I know people do not like Wikipedia but there are times it does come in handy. "Sodium borate is used in biochemical and chemical laboratories to make buffers. Sufficient exposure to borax dust can cause respiratory and skin irritation. Ingestion may cause gastrointestinal distress including nausea, persistent vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Effects on the vascular system and brain include headaches and lethargy, but are less frequent."

According to the European Chemicals Agency they had a lot to say about disodium tetraborate. "Pursuant to Annex V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/20095 as of 1 December 2010 disodium tetraborate, anhydrous (and the two hydrates, pentahydrate and decahydrate) will be listed in Table 3.2 (the list of harmonised classification and labelling of hazardous substances from Annex I to Directive 67/548/EEC) of Annex VI, part 3, of Regulation (EC) No 1272/20086 as toxic for reproduction category 27, R60-61 (May impair fertility. May cause harm to the unborn child).Therefore, this classification of the substance in Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 shows that the substance meets the criteria for classification as toxic for reproduction in accordance with Article 57 (c) of REACH." (This corresponds to a classification Repr. 1B; H360-FD (May damage fertility. May damage the unborn child) in Annex VI, part 3, Table 3.1 of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (list of harmonised classification and labeling of hazardous substances).

Maybe this is why so many young women are having irregular menses, no menses and/or are being diagnosed with premature ovarian failure. I wonder if this chemical vaccine cocktail could cause PCOS (polycystic ovarian syndrome). This has also been reported on my groups many times.

Let me simplify this. What we have is a chemical cocktail that has the very, very real possibility of causing vasodilation, orthostatic hypotension (decrease in blood pressure, more specifically systolic blood pressure, during change from a supine to an erect position), mental deficiencies, auto-immune diseases, anemia, retard growth, infertility in men and women, etc. It can also damage an unborn child. I believe that this vaccine cocktail should be referenced as toxic because the ingredients in the adjuvant and the carrier solution independently have the potential to cause harm. You put all these toxic chemicals together and now you could have a real vaccine toxic cocktailthat could cause heart problems and infertility besides all the other side effects is could cause.

I can't make this stuff up people. When I found it all and put it all together with the articles that I have written in the last month all I could do is shake my head and wonder. How the heck can they say that this vaccine is safe?

To me this vaccine looks like a chemical soup that was not made to immunize but to sterilize the youth of the world.

Stop sending vaccines to Africa. Send them food and clean water. I think that would have a more lasting impression when they do not go hungry.

(1) Clinical Review of Biologics License Application Supplement for Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant (Gardasil®) to extend indication for prevention of vaginal and vulvar cancers related to HPV types 16 and 18. Dated September 11, 2008

(2) Clinical Review of Biologics License Application for Human Papillomavirus, 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 Virus Like Particle Vaccine (S. cerevisiae), (STN 125126 GARDASIL), manufactured by Merck, Inc.

(3) Effect of Alternative Aluminum Adjuvants on the Absorption and Immunogenicity of HPV16 L1 VLPs in Micehttp://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/vaccines/CaulfieldHV3-4.pdf

(4) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? pp.2630-2637 (8) Authors: L. Tomljenovic, C. A. Shaw, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 18 Issue 17, ISSN: 0929-8673,http://vaccinexchange.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/tomljenovic_shaw-cmc-published2.pdf

(5) Hydroxy is adj, (Chemistry / Elements & Compounds) (of a chemical compound) containing one or more hydroxyl groups, [hydro- + oxy(gen)]

(6) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC88911/?tool=pmcentrez — ...in the gaseous phase. H2O2 acts as an oxidant by producing hydroxyl free radicals (•OH) which attack essential cell components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA. It has been proposed that exposed sulfhydryl groups and double bonds are particularly targeted (38).

(7) Physicians Package Insert,http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM111263.pdf

(8) Canterbury District Health Board

(9) Effects of Adsorption to Aluminum Salt Adjuvants on the Structure and Stability of Model Protein Antigens, January 31, 2005, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500687200 April 8, 2005 The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280, 13406-13414.

(10) Aluminum Hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

Volume 103, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 1555-1562

The Eighth Keele Meeting on Aluminium , doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.05.019Christopher A. Shawa, b, c, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michael S. Petrikc

(11) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? pp.2630-2637 (8) Authors: L. Tomljenovic, C. A. Shaw, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 18 Issue 17, ISSN: 0929-8673,http://vaccinexchange.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/tomljenovic_shaw-cmc-published2.pdf

(12) Merck Manual

(13) Autism Spectrum Disorders and Allergy: Observation from a Pediatric Allergy/immunology Clinic, Harumi Jyonouchi , Posted: 06/15/2010; Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6(3):397-411. © 2010 Expert Reviews Ltd.http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/721702

(14) Possible role of histamine in pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases: Implications for immunotherapy with histamine-2 receptor antagonists,Medical Hypotheses, Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 349-355, H. Nielsen, J. Hammer

(15) Sodium Chloride for Broiler Breeders, Poult Sci 1983. 62:480-482. doi:10.3382/ps.0620480, © 1983 Poultry Science Association

(16) Right to Know Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet Common Name:ALUMINUM PHOSPHATE, Synonyms: Aluminum Monophosphate, CAS No: 7784-30-7, Molecular Formula: AlPO4, RTK Substance No: 0062, Description: Solid, corrosive chemical which may be in a liquid or gel form

(17) Sciencelab.com, Inc. Product Name: Aluminum Phosphate, Catalog Codes: SLA4810, CAS#: 7784-30-7, RTECS: TB6450000, TSCA: TSCA 8(b) inventory: Aluminum Phosphate, CI#: Not available., Synonym: Phosphoric Acid, Aluminum salt; Aluminum orthophosphate, Chemical Name: Aluminum Phosphate

(18) SPI Pharma, Inc., Material Name: ALUMINUM PHOSPHATE, Chemical Name: Inorganic Salt

(19) The Free Dictionary, Aluminum Hydroxide

(20) Science Lab, Aluminum Hydroxide, Synonym: Aluminum Hydroxide Powder Reagent; Aluminum Trihyroxide, Chemical Name: Aluminum Hydroxide Powder, Chemical Formula: Al(OH0)3

© Cynthia A. Janak

Tips On Beating Radiation Effects From Fukushima (video)

Why You Need a Hoop House BAD!

Genetically modified freak foods are in 80% of all packaged foods in America and you don't have a right to know according to the FDA. You're supposed to trust them and their corporate masters that everything is safe and good to eat. Well actually they haven't done such a good job on the drugs they approve with testing, so how well could they possible do with GMO foods that have never been tested? That makes you the guinea pig, doesn't it? How does that grab you? You good with that? WHEN ITS LIKE THIS THEN THERE IS ONLY ONE OPTION- GROW YOUR OWN FOOD OR PERISH!

Infographic: All The Genetically Modified Food You're Eating

BY MORGAN CLENDANIELFri Oct 14, 2011

GMO crops have infiltrated 80% of all the packaged food in the United States, and no one has told you. Here's why.

Genetically modified food is in a store near you today. In fact, it's been there for years. You may not know it, but in all the fracas over genetically modified food, one point is often left out: You've been eating it for a long time and no one has told you. This infographic fromNature's Path--which makes organic cereals, bars, and waffles that contain no GMO ingredients, they'd like you to know--shows where you're getting your genetically modified treats, and why no one has told you:

Many crops are genetically modified so frequently, it's nearly impossible to find non-GMO versions. These modifications usually involve either a seed manufacturer making their seeds genetically resistant to a certain type of weed-killer (that the seed company also conveniently sells--synergy!) or to make plants resistant to certain pests naturally.

You may not know that you're eating these crops--despite the fact that they appear in 80% of all packaged food sold in the country--because the U.S. is one of the few places in the developed world that doesn't require food producers to disclose whether or not their ingredients have any modifications.

If something is labeled "organic" by the USDA, that means it has no GMO crops. The Non-GMO Project is also working on a system for labeling products that aren't genetically enhanced. To be fair, there isn't any science that proves that GMO crops are at all bad for consumption; there also aren't any that confirm that they're safe. For now, we're in the dark. And more and more GMO products--like Monsanto's sneaky, unlabeled sweet corn, the first direct-to-consumer GMO food--are coming to market every day. The full infographic is here:

The Plan to Control You From Cradle to Grave (video)

My interpretation of The Matrix movies is that corporations, represented by "Mr Smith", an artificial all powerful person, with a million clones, take to themselves the power to control "natural persons" in every single aspect of life. Could this be happening now? Corporations now control all the governments of the World and are using government power to make themselves supreme rulers over all, especially through drugs, vaccines and food. Will the corporate rulership plan work? Where's Morpheus and Neo when you really need them? O, that's right- they were just corporate produced fantasy heros in a corporate movie! Darn! Are there any real human heros around?

Natural Solutions to BPA, the Plastic Toxin

Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most toxic chemicals on the planet and is found in plastics- like the plastic bottle your health drink comes in. BPA causes cancer among other things in extremely small doses and is as common as plastic. That means all of us have been exposed and nearly all of us have significant enough levels to be concerned about. Here's an article that may offer some useful suggestions for handling this problem.
Monday, October 17, 2011

The BPA Solution -- How to Naturally Reverse the Effects

Anthony Gucciardi
Activist Post

Bisphenol A (BPA) has made mainstream headlines as an estrogen-mimicking health destroyer. With 130 studies tying it to breast cancer, BPA has become anespecially popular topic this October — National Breast Cancer Awareness Month.

Of course the negative effects of BPA do not end with cancer, with studies tying  BPA to obesity, hormonal imbalance, and a massive reduction in male fertility rates. What makes BPA especially concerning to public health is the fact that it affects virtually everyone, is present in 95% of paper money and is in 18 out of 20 of the most popularcanned foods. While there can be steps taken to avoid exposure, BPA is most likely present in your bloodstream way beyond ‘safe’ limits. All of these facts have been well-documented, but what is not often discussed is the fact that solutions exist to reverse BPA damage using 100% natural substances. 

Reversing the effects of BPA 

Ad

While BPA damages the body in such a way that can disrupt proper biological function, natural substances have actually been found to reverse this damage on a number of levels. With recent major studies finding that probiotic supplementation can degrade the presence of BPA, a whole new door is open into solving the BPA crisis, not just simply highlighting BPA dangers. For starters, here is a list of 3 common natural substances (out of 13 total) that studies have shown are effective in combating the effects of BPA, or even the presence of BPA in one way or another:

• Black Tea
• Probiotics
• Melatonin

Each of these have at least one study demonstrating its combative effects on BPA toxicity, presence, and damage. What’s even better is the fact that at least one of these items is most likely already a part of your daily routine. It is also important to remember these are only 3 of the 13 substances that have been shown to effectively combat the effects of BPA. One such example is a study involving a probiotic bacteria present in kimchi, fermented Korean dish made of vegetables with varied seasonings. The study, out of the Japanese Department of Environmental Technology,found that the probiotic bacteria – Bacillus pumilus, is capable of degrading BPA.

In a similar vein, royal jelly has been found to halt the estrogenic effects of BPA, the primary cause of its hormonal damage. This is great news for women concerned with increased breast cancer risk over BPA exposure, as increased estrogen is the primary factor in upping the risk. The use of royal in women with exposure to BPA (the vast majority) will drastically decrease breast cancer risk as a result of BPA exposure and subsequent estrogen increase.

The list goes up to 13 substances that are effective at combating BPA on multiple levels, from the initial biological response to diminishing its presence in your system. The complete 13 substances and nutrients are:

• Bifidobacterium 3
• Bifidobacterium Breve
• Lactobacillus casei
• Probiotics
• Melatonin
• Bacillus pumilus
• Black Tea
• Fermented Foods and Beverages
• Kimchi
• Quercetin
• Royal Jelly
• Folic Acid
• Genistein 

Counteract BPA dangers naturally

Utilizing these 13 key substances in fighting BPA exposure is essential to achieving optimum health and ridding this extremely toxic chemical from your body. It is also a good idea to practice BPA avoidance, as it is possible to distance yourself from major sources of exposure and thus the effects of BPA using simple techniques. Instead of using plastic water bottles, filter your water into glass or stainless steel containers. Avoid usage of plastic containers and cooking ware,choose ceramic kitchen tools for longer life and 100% reduced exposure.

If you are working in a position that requires constant handling of currency, plastic items, or even ink-based items, wear gloves. BPA enters the bloodstream through the skin, if it is not incontact, then you will not absorb it. Following these tips and utilizing the 13 key BPA solution substances in your daily life will result in better overall biological function and mental clarity.

Please visit Natural Society for more great health news and vaccine information. 

CDC Vaccine Scam Exposed (video)

The latest kick the CDC is promoting big time is a whooping cough scare in California, trying to stampede parents in that state to do what is in the best interests of the vaccine manufacturers. When you check you find that the CDC does not even stand behind their own rhetorical propaganda...It's a scam!

CDC Cover Up of Vaccine Dangers

Here is more usable intelligence concerning the abusive use of vaccines against the American people and the people of the world. It seems that the powers that be have known all along how dangerous vaccines actually are but have covered it all up because evidently vaccines are doing what they are designed to do- kill, harm and disable people. Those who control the CDC and the FDA won't allow those agencies to do the job the American people expect them to be doing. Who are the ones who are forcing the CDC to commit crimes against the people? They are the guilty ones...


The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up... (Part One)

Opinion by Consumer Advocate  Tim Bolen 

Tuesday, October 4th,  2011

More Articles About the Geier Case

The Attack on Mark and David Geier... Why Was The Word-Wide Vaccine industry So Panicked Over The Geiers Addressing the UNEP Meeting in Japan? About Kathleen Seidel - Would You Leave Your Child in This Woman's Day Care Center? What's Coming Up in the Geier Case... The Fundamental Issues Coming Up in the Geier Case... The Vaccine Industry's Campaign to Destroy Mark and David Geier is Failing Miserably ... The United Nations Invites Mark Geier MD to Lead the Charge Against the Vaccine Industry... All About THIMEROSAL - Why the Controversy? Vaccines - The Emperor Has No Clothes... The Federal "Data Quality Act" Is Our Friend... The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up... (Part One)

I've been working on this story for months.  There are so many parts and paths to it, and the information I have gathered is so shocking, it is simply difficult to write. 

Maybe it is taking so long because I don't want to be the messenger. 

And, I am going to have to break this story up into several parts.

Starting Point...

A man named Brian Hooker PhD has recently filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in Washington DC against the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) demanding that the CDC quit stalling on his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and provide him with the public information he is looking for.  Hooker has been making specific FOIA requests to the CDC since March 11, 2005 on the subject of the CDC's five "Thimerosal in vaccines studies." The CDC claims, falsely, that these five studies prove the safety and efficacy of Thimerosal.

Hooker had adequate reasons to be suspicious of the CDC, and their Thimerosal position.  I will give you those details in another article.

Hooker is a scientist and knows how studies are supposed to be done.  When he examined those five CDC studies he found a number of serious credibility issues with every one of them.  So he began asking questions, and it wasn't long before the CDC shut the door.  Illegally.

The CDC simply did not want a real scientist asking them pointed questions.

Hooker wants the details, including all communications between the parties involved in the studies' communications (letters, emails, etc.).  He has accumulated, over time, a massive amount of information on the subject, and is insistent on getting, and examining, every last piece of paper, email, whatever.  The CDC is falling all over itself trying to keep records away from Brian Hooker.

Hooker has a thirteen year old son with Autism. As usual, Brian Hooker's son was just fine prior to being vaccinated.

I have seen what Brian Hooker has already gathered and on the basis of that alone I can easily reach the conclusion, as you would, that:

The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - and Has Covered It Up...

What I am going to tell you about in this article is that the anti-vaccination movement is absolutely right in their concerns about the vaccine situation, and, in fact, many parts of the movement would be far more upset if they knew what I NOW KNOW.

The situation is far worse than you can imagine.

So, let's begin...

Where we are...

There is a massive vaccine construction based in the United States that controls an integral part of the world-wide health care offering.  That construction is, rightfully so, a major subject for argument.  That "vaccine construction" is made up of an unholy alliance between Federal/State agencies and the vaccine industry.  It operates without ANY oversight.  None.  All efforts to even monitor it are blocked.  All efforts.

To balance that there is, world-wide, a significant "anti-vaccination" movement made up of very solid, concerned people.  This movement, itself, is diverse in its interests and focus.  Often there is disagreement among advocates about the problems and possible solutions.

What everybody, whether pro-vaccination or anti-vaccination, knows, and recognizes quite well, is that since the implementation of an increased mandatory childhood vaccination schedule, major health problems have arisen within the population base served by those vaccinations.  The point - the more vaccines there are the more problems we have.

And, as Anne Dachel of Age of Autism (AOA) says, those problems are affecting our society at large.

According to the anti-vaccination movement there are many different concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.  Those advocates, rightfully, make demand of the government agencies put in place to monitor health programs to INVESTIGATE and FIND SOLUTION to those issues.  And that's where the problem becomes exacerbated - those agencies.  They are not doing what they are supposed to be doing.  They are NOT really investigating and they are certainly NOT finding solutions.  They are doing exactly the opposite.

There is something else, entirely, going on here.

Let me simplify the problem by breaking it down into its components...

Every government agency is set up by simple formula.  In short, when an agency is created by Congress, or any other means, it is given a Mission, funding, and oversight.  That agency is subject to standard US law, including those laws set up to regulate all agencies.  And, the employees of that agency are expected to perform their duties according to the law, and the Mission of the agency.

(1)  Mission - "THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) is the United States government's principal agency for protecting the health of all Americans and providing essential human services, especially for those who are least able to help themselves." The CDC is part of the HHS.

(2)  Oversight - One basic policy that agencies must conform to is "oversight." There are several ways agencies are subjected to oversight, but the one we are interested here we will call  "basic citizen oversight,"  demonstrated by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Data Quality Act (DQA).  In short, "we the people" have the right to examine an agency's daily activities.  And, we can do that in several ways.  One of those is by FOIA Request.

The idea of FOIA, and similar laws in individual States called "Public Records Acts" is fundamental.  As an example, just below, is an excerpt from the State of California Public Records Act, enabled by California GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6250-6270.  It says:

6250.  In enacting this chapter, the Legislature, mindful of the
right of individuals to privacy, finds and declares that access to
information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a
fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state.

6251.  This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the
California Public Records Act.

Every State in the US has similar law in effect.  You can read the entire California Public Records Act by clicking here.

It is easy to see that "we the people" intended, right from the beginning, to control our agencies by observing their daily activities - and that we mean to observe those agencies on a "right now" basis.

In a FOIA situation, for instance, the government agency is required, by law, to respond within twenty (20) days.

Twenty (20) days.  Not six (6) years as in the Hooker v CDC case...  Keep reading.

Why did "we the people" set in place such laws?  Because, simply, "we the people" know, quite well, that we need to control government agencies.  In order to control them we need to know, on a daily basis, what they are doing.

Often we hear the statement about an agency being "out of control."  An agency hiding what it is doing from the public, unless "we the people" authorized them to hide certain things, is certainly "out of control," for that agency has removed a primary control mechanism.

If an agency is, in fact, "out of control," then it is reasonable to assume that every action it undertakes is NOT in the interests of "we the people."  Why else would they operate in that manner?

(3)  Malfeasance - Another important factor is the understanding of what the legal term "malfeasance in office" means in regard to Public employees.  Malfeasance is considered to be a corrupt act, a crime, and is punishable by imprisonment.  A simple explanation is below, an excerpt from the Louisiana State Law:

A.  Malfeasance in office is committed when any public officer or public employee shall:

(1)  Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or

(2)  Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or

(3)  Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner.

B.  Any duty lawfully required of a public officer or public employee when delegated by him to a public officer or public employee shall be deemed to be a lawful duty of such public officer or employee.  The delegation of such lawful duty shall not relieve the public officer or employee of his lawful duty.

C.(1)  Whoever commits the crime of malfeasance in office shall be imprisoned for not more than five years with or without hard labor or shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or both.

(2)  In addition to the penalty provided for in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection, a person convicted of the provisions of this Section may be ordered to pay restitution to the state if the state suffered a loss as a result of the offense.  Restitution shall include the payment of legal interest at the rate provided in R.S. 13:4202.

(4)  Intentional Obstruction of Justice - Constance V. Vecchione writing for the Massachusetts Bar of Overseers talks, below, about the spoliation of evidence.  Why is this important?  Because the Courts have held that the Exemption (Exemption b5) rule that CDC uses to deny requests parallels the Rules for Discovery in Civil cases.  Vecchione says:

To the spoliator belongs the victory? Not in the post-Enron/Andersen, post Sarbanes-Oxley world. And not in the wake of recent Supreme Judicial Court decisions clarifying the scope of the obligation to retain evidence and the penalties for failure, even negligently, to do so.

Mass. R. Prof. C. 3.4(a), adopted in 1998, prohibits lawyers from unlawfully obstructing another party's access to evidence or unlawfully altering, destroying, or concealing a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. The rule further provides that lawyers cannot counsel or assist another person in such acts. The comment to the rule emphasizes its purpose to insure “fair competition” in the adversary process and to secure opposing parties’ procedural rights of access to evidence through subpoena or discovery.

US Courts are taking destruction or withholding of evidence seriously with both serious civil and criminal penalties.  Vecchionne also says:

Beyond civil sanctions, lawyers and clients should also take note of applicable criminal statutes. The federal crime of obstruction of justice is defined by 18 U.S.C. § 1503 to include conduct that, among other things, corruptly endeavors to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice.

More, US Attorney General Eric Holder, on orders from the President, issued a 59 page legal opinion in 2010 on the use of Exemption 5.  You can read the whole thing by clicking here.  In short, the CDC has no legal leg to stand on withholding information. Just below you will find the opening lines to the Opinion:

"Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act protects "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency." Courts have construed this somewhat opaque language to "exempt those documents, and only those documents that are normally privileged in the civil discovery context."

When administering the FOIA, it is important to first note that the President and Attorney General have issued memoranda to all agencies emphasizing that the FOIA reflects a "profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government" and directing agencies to "adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure."

(5)  CDC Funding - 10 billion dollars a year from taxpayers - and there is severe criticism.  Watch this short NBC video called CDC Misusing funds.  More, take a look at the Congressional Report they are talking about called "CDC Off Center."  The report's first page says:

"A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease."

Where's the Beef?

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a US government agency relied upon by, not just the US, but by the entire civilized world, to give guidance and leadership on Planet Earth's health issues.  It's opinions and strategies are never questioned and, for various reasons, primarily its control of funding, the CDC, in the US, sets policy on health issues from Washington DC, right through individual State's Public Health structures, down to each and every American citizen.

It's pronouncements are as from God.  And if you are in the health care system, you better be a believer.

In the world, most governments look to US CDC policy, assuming, as we have now found out is simply not true, that the US CDC really is a truthful, knowledgeable, source for health information.  Especially on vaccines.

It is, we have found, anything but truthful and knowledgeable.

In roughly 1998 certain management employees at the US CDC became aware, through their own official investigation, that there were significant problems with the use of Thimerosal (mercury) as a preservative in vaccines, and that those problems were being exacerbated by the increased vaccine schedule.  One of their top researchers was telling them so and had given them a Draft Report.  Decisions were made to cover up the report, keeping it away from the public eye.

More, because of what happened next, those CDC employees went on to hire one fake "study" after another countering the results of the original Draft Report.  The author of the first of those studies, the so-called Danish Study, is now being indicted for fraud in the US.

Worse, those high level CDC employees, to cover up what was happening, violated, and conspired to violate, several major US laws designed to prevent ROGUE EMPLOYEES from just this sort of activity.

Those CDC employee's actions had horrible consequences - for a whole world believed them, and relied on their words to establish their own vaccine policies.

The consequences in terms of Autism, alone...

By US government calculations 104 million children, a year (4 million in the US and Canada, and 100 million in the rest of the world), are born into the world covered by the US CDC recommended Childhood Vaccination Schedule. 

Autism - We know, for instance, that since the increased Childhood Vaccination Schedule went into effect that Autism rates in the US went from one in ten thousand (1 in 10,000) to one in one hundred ten (1 in 110).  A disaster.  The CDC response - "we don't know why that's happening."  A lie - they did know, and they do know.

Most countries do not yet keep comparative records regarding autism and/or neurological issues.  We can only, using the US numbers, extrapolate.

Children are a nation's largest asset...

So let's ask the question "How many children were actually affected?"  Let's do the numbers...

World wide (not counting the US and Canada) - From 1998 to 2011 - Autism - (1 in 110) = .9% of 100 million children  = 900,000 children - every year.

Let me say that again - 900,000 children, world wide, EVERY YEAR from 1998 to 2011, became Autistic, for a total of eleven million, seven hundred thousand, (11,700,000) children between 1998 and 2011.

Supposedly, Thimerosal was removed from US/Canadian Childhood Vaccines in 2004.  So, from 1998 to 2004, using the same formula, one hundred eighty thousand (180,000)  US children became Autistic.

Making the World-wide Autism Grand Total - From 1998 to 2011 = 11,880,000 children.

And, that's not the worst of it.

The one in six numbers...

In an earlier article "Some Words About Bobbie Kennedy Junior..." I had discussed reading what Kennedy had said earlier about the CDC.  There was a reason I was researching what Kennedy Jr. was saying about vaccines.  Kennedy had said that "1 out of 6 children are diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem."

What?  One out of six?  I was looking through Kennedy's stuff to see where HE got those numbers, and what I found was a page (Kennedy's source) called "AUTISM   A. L. A. R. M." which says:

"This project is funded by a cooperative agreement between the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

And, right there on the top page it says:

Autism is prevalent
• 1 out of 6 children are diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem
• 1 in 166 children are diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder
• Developmental disorders have subtle signs and may be easily missed

Listen to parents
• Early signs of autism are often present before 18 months
• Parents usually DO have concerns that something is wrong
• Parents generally DO give accurate and quality information
• When parents do not spontaneously raise concerns, ask if they have any

Act early
• Make screening and surveillance an important part of your practice (as endorsed by the AAP)
• Know the subtle differences between typical and atypical development
• Learn to recognize red flags
• Use validated screening tools and identify problems early
• Improve the quality of life for children and their families through early and appropriate intervention

Refer
• To Early Intervention or a local school program (do not wait for a diagnosis)
• To an autism specialist, or team of specialists, immediately for a definitive diagnosis
• To audiology and rule out a hearing impairment
• To local community resources for help and family support

Monitor
• Schedule a follow-up appointment to discuss concerns more thoroughly
• Look for other features known to be associated with autism
• Educate parents and provide them with up-to-date information
• Advocate for families with local early intervention programs, schools, respite care agencies, and insurance companies
• Continue surveillance and watch for additional or late signs of autism and/or other developmental disorders

In short - the CDC not only knows about the problem, it has discussed it and made recommendations.

The One in Six Numbers...

Doing the numbers:  Once again since most countries do not keep records we must extrapolate from US numbers.

One hundred four million (104,000,000) children born every year times thirteen years = 1,352,000,000 children born, worldwide, between 1998 and 2011.

One in six translates to 16.7 %.  So 16.7 % of 1,352,000,000 children =  225,784,000 children.

In other words, according to this government agency website, world wide, 225,784,000 children have been "diagnosed with a developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem.

Two hundred twenty five million, seven hundred eighty four thousand children have a "developmental disorder and/or behavioral problem?"

That's the equivalent of two thirds of the population of the United States.  And the CDC, the supposed health experts, say "we don't know why that's happening."

So who exactly is this CDC?

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a branch of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).  It's Mission, given to it by legislation, is supposedly, as follows:

CDC Mission

Collaborating to create the expertise, information, and tools that people and communities need to protect their health – through health promotion, prevention of disease, injury and disability, and preparedness for new health threats.

CDC seeks to accomplish its mission by working with partners throughout the nation and the world to

• monitor health,
• detect and investigate health problems,
• conduct research to enhance prevention,
• develop and advocate sound public health policies,
• implement prevention strategies,
• promote healthy behaviors,
• foster safe and healthful environments,
• provide leadership and training.

Those functions are the backbone of CDC′s mission. Each of CDC′s component organizations undertakes these activities in conducting its specific programs. The steps needed to accomplish this mission are also based on scientific excellence, requiring well-trained public health practitioners and leaders dedicated to high standards of quality and ethical practice.

High sounding words - right?  It would be even better if any of it were true - which it is not.  The reality is something totally different, making the CDC in its entirety, an enemy of the American people.  In fact, America's worst enemy.

In short, Americans cannot trust ANYTHING the CDC says or does.  It has no credibility, whatsoever.  Why?   It has made certain that it is accountable to no one, and that it has to explain itself to no other entity. Certainly not to the American people.

How do I know this?  Because I am in possession of legal documents designed to force the CDC to, once again, answer to the American electorate.  I'll show you these documents shortly, and explain them in detail.

In 1998 the CDC Staff compiled a Draft copy of an exacting internal CDC study on vaccines which clearly pointed out all of the dangers of those vaccines, in detail, with explanations of why that was true.  CDC management went into shock, forced the head of the study out of the CDC, changed the data and the findings of the study, and brought it out as proving the opposite, even using the original researcher's name on the now faked study's title.

That started a brouhaha.  The original researcher would not back down, and loudly, via email, complained about CDC management putting his name on the fake study, reversing his original findings.  He did so by addressing the largest, at the time, meeting of the CDC and what they call their "stakeholders," with the REAL results of his study at a place called Simpsonwood, and the reactions to his address had far reaching results

It is those email communications, and others like it, where Brian Hooker began to unravel the CDC plot.

Congressional Oversight ignored...

In 2003, even the US Congress began to smell the CDC stink and investigated.  A Report, after a three year investigation, prepared by the Staff of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness Committee on Government Reform United States House of Representatives called "Mercury in Medicine –Taking Unnecessary Risks" made startling conclusions.  Like this:

A. Findings - Through this investigation of pediatric vaccine safety, the following findings are made:

1. Mercury is hazardous to humans. Its use in medicinal products is undesirable, unnecessary and should be minimized or eliminated entirely.

2. For decades, ethylmercury was used extensively in medical products ranging from vaccines to topical ointments as preservative and an antibacteriological agent.

3. Manufacturers of vaccines and thimerosal, (an ethylmercury compound used in vaccines), have never conducted adequate testing on the safety of thimerosal. The FDA has never required manufacturers to conduct adequate safety testing on thimerosal and ethylmercury compounds.

4. Studies and papers documenting the hypoallergenicity and toxicity of thimerosal (ethylmercury) have existed for decades.

5. Autism in the United States has grown at epidemic proportions during the last decade. By some estimates the number of autistic children in the United States is growing between 10 and 17 percent per year. The medical community has been unable to determine the underlying cause(s) of this explosive growth.

6. At the same time that the incidence of autism was growing, the number of childhood vaccines containing thimerosal was growing, increasing the amount of ethylmercury to which infants were exposed threefold.

7. A growing number of scientists and researchers believe that a relationship between the increase in neurodevelopmental disorders of autism, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, and speech or language delay, and the increased use of thimerosal in vaccines is plausible and deserves more scrutiny. In 2001, the Institute of Medicine determined that such a relationship is biologically plausible, but that not enough evidence exists to support or reject this hypothesis.

8. The FDA acted too slowly to remove ethylmercury from over-the-counter products like topical ointments and skin creams. Although an advisory committee determined that ethylmercury was unsafe in these products in 1980, a rule requiring its removal was not finalized until 1998.

9. The FDA and the CDC failed in their duty to be vigilant as new vaccines containing thimerosal were approved and added to the immunization schedule. When the Hepatitis B and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b vaccines were added to the recommended schedule of childhood immunizations, the cumulative amount of ethylmercury to which children
were exposed nearly tripled.

10. The amount of ethylmercury to which children were exposed through vaccines prior to the 1999 announcement exceeded two safety thresholds established by the Federal government for a closely related substance – methylmercury. While the Federal Government has established no safety threshold for ethylmercury, experts agree that the methylmercury guidelines are a good substitute. Federal health officials have conceded that the amount of thimerosal in vaccines exceeded the EPA threshold of 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of bodyweight. In fact, the amount of mercury in one dose of DTaP or Hepatitis B vaccines (25 micrograms each) exceeded this threshold many times over. Federal health officials have not conceded that this amount of thimerosal in vaccines exceeded the FDA’s more relaxed threshold of 0.4 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. In most cases, however, it clearly did.

11. The actions taken by the HHS to remove thimerosal from vaccines in 1999 were not sufficiently aggressive. As a result, thimerosal remained in some vaccines for an additional two years.

12. The CDC’s failure to state a preference for thimerosal- free vaccines in 2000 and again in 2001 was an abdication of their responsibility. As a result, many children received vaccines containing thimerosal when thimerosal- free alternatives were available.

13. The Influenza vaccine appears to be the sole remaining vaccine given to children in the United States on a regular basis that contains thimerosal. Two formulations recommended for children six months of age or older continue to contain trace amounts of thimerosal. Thimerosal should be removed from these vaccines. No amount of mercury is appropriate in any childhood vaccine.

14. The CDC in general and the National Immunization Program in particular are conflicted in their duties to monitor the safety of vaccines, while also charged with the responsibility of purchasing vaccines for resale as well as
promoting increased immunization rates.

15. There is inadequate research regarding ethylmercury neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

16. There is inadequate research regarding the relationship between autism and the use of mercury-containing vaccines.

17. To date, studies conducted or funded by the CDC that purportedly dispute any correlation between autism and vaccine injury have been of poor design, under-powered, and fatally flawed. The CDC’s rush to support and promote such research is reflective of a philosophical conflict in looking fairly at emerging theories and clinical data related to adverse reactions from vaccinations.

More, the Congressional Report made Recommendations - which were BLATANTLY ignored.  As follows:

B. Recommendations

1. Access by independent researchers to the Vaccine Safety Datalink database is needed for independent replication and validation of CDC studies regarding exposure of infants to mercury-containing vaccines and autism. The current process to allow access remains inadequate.

2. A more integrated approach to mercury research is needed. There are different routes that mercury takes into the body, and there are different rates of absorption. Mercury bioaccumulates; the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) clearly states: “This substance may harm you.”

8. Studies should be conducted that pool the results of independent research that has been done thus far, and a comprehensive approach should be developed to rid humans, animals, and the environment of this dangerous toxin.
3. Greater collaboration and cooperation between federal agencies responsible for safeguarding public health in regard to heavy metals is needed.

4. The President should announce a White House conference on autism to assemble the best scientific minds from across the country and mobilize a national effort to uncover the causes of the autism epidemic.

5. Congress needs to pass legislation to include in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) provisions to allow families who believe that their children’s autism is vaccine-induced the opportunity to be included in the program. Two provisions are key: First, extending the statute of limitations as recommended by the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines from 3 to 6 years. Second, establishing a one to two year window for families, whose children were injured after 1988 but who do not fit within the statute of limitations, to have the opportunity to file
under the NVICP.

6. Congress should enact legislation that prohibits federal funds from being used to provide products or pharmaceuticals that contain mercury, methylmercury, or ethylmercury unless no reasonable alternative is available.

7. Congress should direct the National Institutes of Health to give priority to research projects studying causal relationships between exposure to mercury, methylmercury, and ethylmercury to autism spectrum disorders,
attention deficit disorders, Gulf War Syndrome, and Alzheimer’s Disease.

So, where are we going with this?

The problems caused by the CDC employees that covered up the Thimerosal issue are just about beyond belief.

It is time for a formal investigation of certain key people now, or formerly, at the CDC. 

More coming.

Stay tuned. 

Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate